{"id":606,"date":"2015-11-23T17:35:39","date_gmt":"2015-11-23T16:35:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.gecosei.it\/?p=606"},"modified":"2016-10-13T17:43:19","modified_gmt":"2016-10-13T15:43:19","slug":"fascicolo-fabbricato-perche-serve","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.gecosei.it\/en\/fascicolo-fabbricato-perche-serve\/","title":{"rendered":"Building issue: because it serves"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

FILE OF THE BUILDING<\/strong><\/p>\n

First you need to define exactly what is meant by this tool, because in the past has been called in different ways (the file home, book house, building booklet and so on.), Names all reviled by homeowners associations (except ours), and defined by them a “useless and expensive collection of documents, able only to make money for the technicians.”<\/p>\n

I would draw the following, the definitions made by the City of Rome as the same had already adopted this tool, making it mandatory: “The issue of the building is a tool for monitoring the state of the built heritage conservation aimed at identifying risk situations of buildings and plan in time restructuring and maintenance to improve the quality of manufactured.<\/p>\n

The preparation of the dossier of the building, following the appeals, lost compulsory, but it is still an operational tool in the City of Rome.<\/p>\n

It also added that, following the recent earthquake, local authorities and institutions are exploring the possibility of restoring the obligatory nature of this instrument. “<\/p>\n

EMERGENCIES AND PREVENTION<\/strong><\/p>\n

Too many emergencies, little prevention. So you can sum up the game of responsibilities which now, in Italy, we got used to – before the Eagle then the Emilia – and that produces the alarm cultural disaster at all costs, and the next buck of responsibility and final hunt guilty in the classrooms of the Court.<\/p>\n

AITEC by a survey, Istat and Ingv are more than 16 million Italian homes built before 1971 (the year in which it was born before the law instituting the obligation to file the signed calculations of an engineer), of which as many as 5, 3,000,000 arise in a defined time zone 3 (medium intensity earthquakes) and more than 760,000 in zone 4 (of high intensity earthquakes). It should be added – according to recent Istat data – which in the last 40 years, the Italian state has spent 145 billion for reconstruction, ie 3.5 billion a year.<\/p>\n

If these figures had been significant expenses for preventive works we would have definitely avoided many disasters, as well as having a housing more responsive to the legislation.<\/p>\n

It must be to know that there is no rule that obligations to standardize the laws earthquake-proof existing buildings, except in some cases.<\/p>\n

NECESSARY TOOL<\/strong><\/p>\n

The dossier of the building as a single certificate must have certification value, otherwise it would become a tool of pure rationalization of data and information, but not effective. The booklet is intended as a substitute for:<\/p>\n